Evolving inputs
Product copy, imagery, and stakeholder feedback continued to change while the site was being assembled.
Case study 02 · Shipped · Jan–May 2026
From product pages to a working inquiry pipeline.
I built SuperGrowth's responsive company and product website, then connected the customer-facing experience to a practical submission, deployment, and handoff workflow.
01Responsive company and product experience
02Product-to-inquiry customer journey
03Sheet-backed submission workflow
04Production release and DNS launch
The assignment
A company website needed to do more than display information.
The site had to present SuperGrowth and its products clearly across screen sizes, give interested visitors a usable way to provide purchase details, and remain simple for the business to operate after development. I owned the implementation from reusable interface components through deployment and production follow-up.
Ownership boundary
Stakeholder suppliedCompany and product content, source assets, business priorities, and review feedback
I ownedResponsive implementation, inquiry flow, submission integration, release, DNS connection, QA, and handoff
What made delivery more than frontend styling
Actionable journey
The product experience needed a clear route from browsing to a structured purchase inquiry.
Simple operations
Submissions had to land somewhere the stakeholder could inspect and own without learning a custom back office.
Real release work
Code, preview environments, hosting, domain configuration, responsive QA, and handoff all had to align.
End-to-end delivery
01
Structure
Turn company content into a usable product journey
I organized company and product information into responsive pages, then built reusable React components so new content could be added without redesigning every screen.
02
Connect
Give product interest a clear next step
Product pages linked through a clear TO ORDER action to a dedicated purchase-information form. The path moved a visitor from browsing into a structured inquiry instead of ending at a static page.
03
Integrate
Build a lightweight, handoff-friendly submission layer
I connected the form to Google Sheets through Apps Script, giving the stakeholder an accessible place to review submissions without introducing a separate operations dashboard.
04
Release
Carry the work through preview, launch, and refinement
I kept changes reviewable in GitHub, used Vercel preview deployments for the form work, connected the production site through GoDaddy DNS, and handled responsive, content, and deployment fixes around launch.
Working system
A small stack, chosen around the actual workflow.
The customer path and the release path stayed deliberately legible. A visitor could move from a product into a structured inquiry, while the team could review code and deployment changes before the domain served a new production version.
Customer-facing Workflow bridge Business-owned record
Customer path
BrowseProduct pageResponsive React UI
→ActPurchase formStructured details
→SubmitApps ScriptRequest handling
→ReviewGoogle SheetAccessible record
Release path
VersionGitHubReviewable changes
→VerifyVercel previewBranch QA
→ServeProduction siteGoDaddy domain
Reconstructed product flow
The interface made the next action obvious.
This reconstruction shows the delivered interaction pattern: reusable product presentation, one consistent order action, and a separate form for collecting the details needed to continue the conversation.
SUPERGROWTHCompany Products Contact
PRODUCTS
Find the right solution for your next project.
PURCHASE INFORMATION
Tell us what you need.
Portfolio reconstruction — no customer submission data shown
Decision record
How should an interested visitor move beyond a product page?
Decision
Use one consistent TO ORDER action that opens a dedicated purchase-information flow.
Why
It kept product pages focused while giving every item the same clear, maintainable next step.
Where should inquiry data go?
Decision
Send validated submissions through Apps Script into a stakeholder-accessible Google Sheet.
Why
The workflow needed reliable collection and easy operational access, not a heavyweight custom admin system.
How should changes reach production safely?
Decision
Keep changes in GitHub and review the order-form work through Vercel branch previews before production release.
Why
Preview deployments made the form and layout testable without turning the live site into the review environment.
Result
The outcome was a launched workflow, not a static mockup.
I shipped a responsive company and product website, connected its order journey to a working submission destination, and completed the release work needed to place it on the business's domain.
- Reusable responsive pages implemented with React and TypeScript
- Product CTA, purchase-information form, Apps Script, and Google Sheet connected
- GitHub review flow, Vercel deployment, GoDaddy DNS, and production QA completed
- Submission materials prepared for stakeholder ownership and continued operation
This case study claims delivered functionality and workflow only. It intentionally does not invent traffic, conversion, revenue, or growth metrics that were not measured.
Previous evidence record
NICE Actimize — governed multi-tenant analytics ←